https://t.co/djkpFA3ddP
This interview worries me a bit, I was expecting more a book of Denizen Paths that are in-universe unrelated but are just called dragons for the ease of the reader, but what this interview suggests is something that has very little relation to actual mythology especially the whole gods destroying the world of the dragons. That seems like it was made up in order to justify categorizing all these completely unrelated creatures under the same name. I hope the mechanics are good and I will still buy it, but I personally feel like having two supplements(this and Masks of The Mythos) coming this soon in the line’s lifespan that have little relation to the premise of the main books, well it doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in me. I feel this would be better off as an alternate setting rather then as a part of the main setting.
This interview worries me a bit, I was expecting more a book of Denizen Paths that are in-universe unrelated but are just called dragons for the ease of the reader, but what this interview suggests is something that has very little relation to actual mythology especially the whole gods destroying the world of the dragons. That seems like it was made up in order to justify categorizing all these completely unrelated creatures under the same name. I hope the mechanics are good and I will still buy it, but I personally feel like having two supplements(this and Masks of The Mythos) coming this soon in the line’s lifespan that have little relation to the premise of the main books, well it doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in me. I feel this would be better off as an alternate setting rather then as a part of the main setting.
Comment