(VTM 1E) A Crossover of Vampire and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas?

[Boneguard]

I'd love to have you on board!

Now to remember what was around in 1992 when I was 16-17 years old (grade 11 was such an interesting year).

[Camilla]

Now to remember what was around in 1992 when I was 16-17 years old (grade 11 was such an interesting year).

I was born in 1993, so I'm just going on what I have read about those days or what I learned from my parents and uncle.

[Nicolas Milioni]

Are we using 1e mechanics as well as the setting,or are we using the most complete mechanics of future editions?

[Camilla]

Are we using 1e mechanics as well as the setting,or are we using the most complete mechanics of future editions?

I was thinking of using V1's rules, but I am open to the idea of using the more accessible V20 rules with V1 fluff.

[Nicolas Milioni]

I was thinking of using V1's rules, but I am open to the idea of using the more accessible V20 rules with V1 fluff.

Using v20 rules would be more pratical i think,just to mend some things

[Boneguard]

1st ed mechanic had a few things that got lost over the years, especially how some discipline work, I wouldn't mind using those for nostalgia sakes.

[Nicolas Milioni]

It's your decision,i'm fine with both

[Camilla]

I am leaning more towards 1e mechanics solely because I've been reading up on them more.

[nunboi]

This is an awesome concept. While I'm not down to play, I'm totally interested in discussing it - I LOVE the purity of vision in 1st ed; hell the Chicago style leadership structure wasn't even a given, let alone how rigid it would get in Revised.

If I have one suggestion, it's to use the original system but remove variable target numbers + numbers of success as your success metric and go with a static target of 7 and difficulty being an increase in the number of successes needed (ie the Aeonverse style), it's the smoothest way to run things,

[Camilla]

This is an awesome concept. While I'm not down to play, I'm totally interested in discussing it - I LOVE the purity of vision in 1st ed; hell the Chicago style leadership structure wasn't even a given, let alone how rigid it would get in Revised.

If I have one suggestion, it's to use the original system but remove variable target numbers + numbers of success as your success metric and go with a static target of 7 and difficulty being an increase in the number of successes needed (ie the Aeonverse style), it's the smoothest way to run things,

I could totally work with that modification to the rules.

[nunboi]

Oh also, some years back there was a great deep dive into the 1st ed setting, via it's By Night's book, over on the rpg.net forums. If you're looking for ideas or a great read, I'd def check it out.

[Camilla]

Oh also, some years back there was a great deep dive into the 1st ed setting, via it's By Night's book, over on the rpg.net forums. If you're looking for ideas or a great read, I'd def check it out.

I've read that thread, it is awesome. If I remember correctly, it's "Let's Read Chicago By Night" and it was awesome.

One of the few good things to come out of RPG.net in a long time.

[nunboi]

That's the one! I tried to do the Montreal thread but life ruined that