So, based on another thread in the forums, someone suggested the creation of were-squirrels. I was wondering if anyone wanted to share their interpretation of the were-squirrel? My interpretation comes from the webcomic El Goonish Shive (though it is much less strong than Grace).
I think that were-squirrels would have five forms (human, near human, hybrid, near squirrel, and squirrel) which would be comparable to the five Kitsune forms. The near human would have Dexterity+1, Stamina+1, and Manipulation-1. The hybrid form would be gain Dexterity+2, Stamina+2, Manipulation -1, and Perception+1. The near squirrel form would have Dexterity+3, Stamina+3, Manipulation-2, and Perception+1. The squirrel form would have Dexterity+4, Stamina+2, Manipulation-1, and Perception+2.
In addition to their normal shapeshifting, were-squirrels would be able to learn additional forms during character creation for 3 freebie points each or after character creation for 3 XP. Each form would be a variation of one of their five basic forms and possess the strengths and weakness of the basic form that they are based on. What other features would you like a were-squirrel to have?
I think that were-squirrels would have five forms (human, near human, hybrid, near squirrel, and squirrel) which would be comparable to the five Kitsune forms. The near human would have Dexterity+1, Stamina+1, and Manipulation-1. The hybrid form would be gain Dexterity+2, Stamina+2, Manipulation -1, and Perception+1. The near squirrel form would have Dexterity+3, Stamina+3, Manipulation-2, and Perception+1. The squirrel form would have Dexterity+4, Stamina+2, Manipulation-1, and Perception+2.
In addition to their normal shapeshifting, were-squirrels would be able to learn additional forms during character creation for 3 freebie points each or after character creation for 3 XP. Each form would be a variation of one of their five basic forms and possess the strengths and weakness of the basic form that they are based on. What other features would you like a were-squirrel to have?
Comment