The Other Five Paths (2e)

[Dataweaver]

This topic is the Second Edition counterpart to my original The Other Five Paths topic. For the overview, I'm using the Pathfinding blog entry as my template.

TO DO LIST
Now that Signs of Sorcery is out (early release at this time), I can look at what else needs to be done with the Paths.

First, each Path needs a “Vision of Truth” entry describing the Supernal World of that Path: how the Ruling Arcana are viewed, and how the other Arcana for into its worldview. This needs to be followed by one Environmental Tilt for each Ruling Arcanum for use with the Aedes systems.

After that, I need to devise a series of Boons for each Path's Supernal Entities, one per Arcanum. See Signs of Sorcery pp.39–43 for examples.

Next, there are charts for Classical Tools and Ars Novum Tools for each Path (pp.47–48); those will need counterpart tables for these Paths.

I've already started work on how Perfected Materials should apply to the various new Paths. But that needs to be completed. This should be done in conjunction with the Path Tools, since one of the entries there is materials.

I think that's it. Am I missing anything?

The Paths

As with the regular Paths, each of these new Paths is defined by a central dichotomy.

Aretos: Theory and Practice
Axios: Risk and Reward
Kleos: Memory and Myth
Mæstros: Authority and Duty
Sophros: Growth and Decay

The Watchtowers

Aretos: the Watchtower of the Amalgam Mallet in the Realm of Utopia
Axios: the Watchtower of the Jeweled Scale in the Realm of the Seven Seas
Kleos: the Watchtower of the Tin Flute in the Realm of the Akasha
Mæstros: the Watchtower of Brass and Flame in the Realm of the Elemental Nation
Sophros: the Watchtower of the Wooden Chalice in the Realm of Elysium

Aedes
Aretos: Functions and Forms
Axios: Terra Incognitae and Ways
Kleos: Rhythms and Rhymes
Mæstros:
Sophros: Harvest Glades and Fertile Fields

Path Stereotypes

Aretos: Artisans and Craftsmen
Axios: Traders and Advocates
Kleos: Sages and Bards
Mæstros: Sorcerers and Evokers
Sophros: Druids and Mediums

Paths As Game Mechanics

Path	Ruling Arcana	Inferior Arcanum
Aretos	Matter and Prime	Fate
Axios	Space and Fate	Life
Kleos	Time and Mind	Space
Mæstros	Forces and Spirit	Prime
Sophros	Life and Death	Time

To an Aretos on the Path of Excellence, the world is full of potential; when he looks at a slab of marble, he sees the sculpture that he can bring out of it. They summon Archetypes.

To an Axios on the Path of Merit, the world is full of Opportunities and Connections. They summon ___.

To a Kleos on the Path of Enlightenment, the record of the world is an open book, and she can read the stories that surround her. They summon Eidolons.

To a Mæstros on the Path of Mastery, the forces in the world are alive with purpose. They summon the Djinn.

To a Sophros on the Path of Balance, the cycle of the Seasons is everywhere, as everything is either developing or fading in turn. They summon Serpents.

How To Use These Paths
Here are four alternate settings to illustrate how these Paths might be used.

Another World
In this version of the Chronicles of Darkness, there are only five Paths; but instead of witches, wizards, alchemists, theurges, and shamans, you have artisans, traders, sages, sorcerers, and druids.

The Ten Watchtowers
In this setting, all ten Paths coexist, and have always coexisted. There is talk about “the Paths of the Soul” (Acanthus, Mastigos, Moros, Obrimos, Thyrsus) that supposedly favor the Subtle Arcana, and “the Paths of the World” (Aretos, Axios, Kleos, Mæstros, Sophros) that supposedly favor the Gross Arcana; but, like the distinction between Subtle and Gross, it's largely a theoretical distinction. Nonetheless, associations are drawn:

Paths of the Soul
Acanthus: the Name
Mastigos: the Spirit
Moros: the Shadow
Obrimos: the Essence
Thyrsus: the Heart

Paths of the World
Aretos: Quintessence
Axios: Water
Kleos: Air
Mæstros: Fire
Sophros: Earth

In this setting, the new Paths of the World get the common Elemental Mastery Legacies, and the original Paths of the Soul get a new set of Legacies based on the five parts of the soul.

The World Has Changed
In 2009, some sort of cosmic event occurred, and new mages started Awakening in large numbers to a sixth Watchtower, the Watchtower of Brass and Flame. But that was just the beginning: over the next two years, four more Watchtowers “came online”, one after the other. It has now been nine years since the first of the New Watchtowers erupted, and seven years since the last one did, and their appearances are as much a mystery now as they were then. No one speaks of “Paths of the Soul” or “Paths of the World”; rather, they're simply “the Old Paths” and “the New Paths”.

Science and Magic
This setting combines these Paths with Gifted Science from Mage Chronicler's Guide. That is, the Aretos, Axios, Kleos, Mæstros, and Sophros aren't Mages who Awakened to Watchtowers; they're Gifted Scientists who have Actualized different Utopias:

• the Aretos are the Path of Engineering, builders of the Singularity
• the Axios are the Path of Utility, advocates of the Market
• the Kleos are the Path of Society, founders of the Republic
• the Mæstros are the Path of Physics, seekers of Type V Civilization
• the Sophros are the Path of Biology, tenders of the Garden

---

Thanks to Dave Brookshaw and Malcolm Sheppard for devising these Technocratic Utopias while writing the Mage Translation Guide; it's unfortunate you had to cut them for space.

Thanks also to malonkey1 for the sigils.

[Hardwire99]

The Pentacle and the Seers would be neutral at first then they would start having their own problems as new factions start showing up.

[TrueMrMultiverse]

That would be super interesting! Would the Pentacle and Seers be fairly neutral in this struggle or would the New Watchtower Mages make their own factions I wonder?

[Hardwire99]

Actually both, I was thinking along the line of the traditional watchtower had less and less awakened and those that were already wakened start loosing power their magic is harder to cast as the new towers start gaining awakened growing in strength. Then possible a war between the old and the new that would decide the dominant magic.

It would start with a feeling that he mages of the old paths would get that something is wrong. The mages of the New paths would stat showing up, they would have a cloud of mystery about them but the Mage society as a whole would overlook it as just strange blips until the watchtowers themselves started opposing each other. By this time the Old path have been weakens, the New paths strengthened the struggle would begin. Will it spill into the sleeping world?

[Dataweaver]

Intriguing! What would it look like for a Watchtower to be slowly destroyed? Would it simply be that Awakenings related to it become gradually less common until they stop entirely? Or would the mages who Awakened to those Watchtowers start to slowly lose their effectiveness until they eventually become Sleepwalkers, as their tie to their Supernal realm slowly frays and eventually breaks?

No, there is not yet anything more on these Paths than what's in this thread. I really do need to buckle down and finish waiting them up; but lately, I haven't had any free time. If you come up with something, feel free to share it; if I like it, I'll incorporate it into the write ups.

[Hardwire99]

Dataweaver Hello, I was wondering if I could get an updated write-up of these 5 new paths, if you have it. I am interested in seeing how they turned out. I am also looking at starting a new Mage game where these 5 paths start appearing due to a Magical Apocalypse (of a sort) The new Watchtowers have appeared and are slowly destroying the old Watchtowers.

[KaiserAfini]

Hmm… I definitely like the ability of an Egregore to serve as a stand-in for a whole group of people: negotiate with Uncle Sam instead of the millions of United States citizens, or Santa Claus instead of the multitude of children who believe in him. I'm not sure that this would be unique to the Traders, though: I could see the Sages and the Sorcerers dealing with Egregores, too, with the Sages dealing with Zeitgeist. And Archetypes, the Supernal Entities of the Artisans, are also sometimes described as a kind of Egregore.

Wouldn't that be easy to confuse with the Order merit of the Mysterium ? How about Kia, its an equivalent that aludes to taming chaos via Fate. It could be the equivalent of using Trades to set order to the inherent "logistical mess and unaccounted resources" of the Tapestry.

[Dataweaver]

Hmm… I definitely like the ability of an Egregore to serve as a stand-in for a whole group of people: negotiate with Uncle Sam instead of the millions of United States citizens, or Santa Claus instead of the multitude of children who believe in him. I'm not sure that this would be unique to the Traders, though: I could see the Sages and the Sorcerers dealing with Egregores, too, with the Sages dealing with Zeitgeist. And Archetypes, the Supernal Entities of the Artisans, are also sometimes described as a kind of Egregore.

[Yama951]

Here's an idea for the special beings the Traders would call upon.

Egregores, a sort of collective tulpa or emergent psychic entity from the interactions of individuals or a sort of mindset or line of reasoning that a collective follows. There's a number of different definitions implied when people were talking about them online.

[Dataweaver]

Let the buyer beware isn't fitting at all, and while that might not be the *only* definition of Trickster it's the one that will first come to people's minds. Good Traders don't stick to the letter of the deal and screw you in the small print. They make a deal that you're happy with so that when they come back next time you'll be happy to trade with them again. Every MBA knows that brand image a key to success in the marketplace, and a brand that says "read the small print, twice, with a lawyer" is not a good brand.

True. But it's also true that a group can end up with a bad reputation because of one bad actor. I'll grant that the “let the buyer beware” Tricksters give a bad name to the rest of them; and when I write them up, I'll emphasize that point. They do exist, and they are what most people think of first; but they're not representative of the average Trickster.

Also I don't think the idea of an adjective works either. The canon ones: Faeries, Demons, Angels, Shades, Beasts, Djinn. They're all nouns. It would be weird to have a Path who's Supernal Entities are a grab-bag of different canon realms.

Not a grab-bag, no. They're unified by a common trait that they share. In that regard, they're not really any different from the way demons were presented in the Tome of the Watchtowers:

Pandemonium is often equated with the Jungian idea of the “Shadow” of the “collective unconscious” — that which is rejected, and hence identified with (but not necessarily identical to) rejects from the other Paths, i.e., fallen angels, Unseelie Fae, rabid beasts, evil dead, etc.

As well: in Signs of Sorcery, angels, demons, fae, beasts, and shades aren't defined in terms of “how are they angelic, demonic, fae-like, bestial, or shady?" They're defined in terms of how they represent the principles of the Obrimos, Mastigos, Acanthus, Thyrsus, and Moros. That is, there's very little in there about what they look like and a lot about how they do things. Conceptually, that's more “adjective” than “noun”.

That said, I'm not using adjectives, for the most part. Archetypes, Tricksters, and Vocalists are nouns; and Chthonics could easily be turned into Chthonians (but that's a separate debate).

And finally, part of the difficulty comes from the fact that the Seven Seas draws on “Arabian Nights” sources which puts it in contention with the Mæstros, who have dibs on that source. Given that common source, the notion that Tricksters might take the form of genies despite the overlap with the Djinn isn't terribly surprising.

And finally, the notion of the common thread of Bargainers between demons, faeries, and genies was in the back of my head when I first conceived the Axios. I've always seen that Path as a conceptual extension of Changeling's Pledges, Demon's Pacts, and Exalted's Eclipse Caste anima banner.

[The Kings Raven]

Let the buyer beware isn't fitting at all, and while that might not be the *only* definition of Trickster it's the one that will first come to people's minds. Good Traders don't stick to the letter of the deal and screw you in the small print. They make a deal that you're happy with so that when they come back next time you'll be happy to trade with them again. Every MBA knows that brand image a key to success in the marketplace, and a brand that says "read the small print, twice, with a lawyer" is not a good brand.

Also I don't think the idea of an adjective works either. The canon ones: Faeries, Demons, Angels, Shades, Beasts, Djinn. They're all nouns. It would be weird to have a Path who's Supernal Entities are a grab-bag of different cannon realms.

[Dataweaver]

I was originally going to use the term Bargainers; and that term may well serve for the Axios Entities of Space, the ones whose imagery tends to be along the lines of the demon, fae, or genie. Their defining feature is that they traffic in some sort of deal-making; and that when you make a deal with them, you need to be wary: they'll give you what you ask for, but not necessarily what you want. They're all infamous for sticking to the letter of the deal, as it were, while perverting the intent. Let the buyer beware. It's in that sense that they're Tricksters.

On the other hand, trickster gods tend to also be benefactors for mankind: I mentioned Prometheus, but I've also seen Hermes described as a trickster god who also fosters trade, and coyote is apparently both a trickster and a benefactor in the Native American mythologies that feature him. In the Axios worldview, you might think of them as “investors”: they find humans who are down on their luck and give them the startup they need to make something of themselves. One might say that they're not doing so out of altruism, but rather to foster future trading partners and customers. So be it: the Axioi are never about altruism, but they can very much be about “growing the pie” so that everyone wins. (From the TaleSpin episode Citizen Khan: “I only desire money and power. Unpresentable employees give me neither.”)

And these are Tricksters, too; it's just that they're tricksters in the sense of being clever and cunning in their largesse.

[The Kings Raven]

Can you think of some kind of supernatural creature that's symbolically linked to Ventures? I ask because while fitting ventures doesn't seem like a word describing a being you can talk to.

[KaiserAfini]

Trickster is more the purview of a con man, not a merchant. The best merchants want to provide you with mutually beneficial agreements, that way you want to come back to them often, recommend them by word of mouth, enter into a joint project with them, etc.

So lets say your cabal wants to make an amazing Sanctum. Demesne, bleeding edge security system, tons of magical defenses, the works. They go to a merchant and try to broker two deals:

1- They want to sell some very interesting enhanced/imbued item that only they can make. This will be the source of mundane resources for the upgrade.

2- They want to borrow a big amount of tass to fuel the magical part. They estimate Hallow production to pay it back in X time with Y interests plus they present some collateral.

Seeing the great tass loan, the merchant asks them to sell him the items at a discount until they can pay back the loan, he will even lower the interest if they do. The cabal agrees and walks out with a better deal than expected, whereas the merchant has a safer way to recover his investment and even earn some nice profit.

How about if they summoned Ventures ? They know better than anyone else where to find the opportunities that lead to success.

[The Kings Raven]

I'm not keen on Tricksters. I think it goes against the fundamental themes of the path. A good Trader isn't a dodgy used car salesman, the path is about mutually profitable exchange. There's risk and reward, but the risk isn't deceptive, a sea storm doesn't trick you. I agree with the opportunities/judgement split, but not tricksters.


As for Chthonics. Serpents are 100 times more fitting. They're symbols of immortality via death and rebirth thanks to mythic interpretations of snakes shedding their skin, and they're venerated by druids. Chthonics come from Greek underworld where death is absolutely a finality rather than a transition, you *might* be able to squeeze Persephone in as a Chthonic under Greek Myth, but she's very much the exception to the rule, she was born an Olympian and kidnapped. More typical Greek Chthonic deities like Hades are all Death all the time without a hint of Life. You mention the hooded Reaper, another example of something that's very much Death-as-an-End and not Death-as-a-cycle.

Stick to Serpents as the entities for Elysium, they're literally perfect for the Sophros while Chthonics are too strongly associated with Death as an ending; and barely associated with Life at all. Serpants are both Life and Death, and they're Cycles as well.


For the Kleos, Muses and Banishes work well.