This might seem like a weird question, but I'd like to know how you would write the trait format for a Wolf-Blooded character.
To explain what I mean, I'm talking about the character templates that you use to lay out characters in the books, like so:
NAME
Auspice:
Tribe:
Mental Attributes: Intelligence, Wits, Resolve
Physical Attributes: Strength (), Dexterity (), Stamina ()
Social Attributes: Presence, Manipulation (), Composure
Mental Skills:
Physical Skills:
Social Skills:
Merits: Language (First Tongue) (●), Totem ●
Primal Urge: 1
Willpower:
Harmony: 7
Essence Max/Per Turn: 10/1
Blood:
Bone:
Health: ()
Initiative:
Defense:
Speed:
Size: 5 (6/7/6/4)
Renown:
Gifts:
Rites:
I don't know what you call them, I just call them "character templates".
I've been using this sort of layout in Word since Vampire: the Masquerade Revised, having copied the way characters are presented in the books.
I just find it much easier to make characters this way when I'm writing them than to edit a character sheet.
Making it as close as possible to the way you write them in the books is sort of a hobby of mine. I try to use the closest fonts to the ones you use and I try to copy your formatting as much as I can. I diverge in small ways, I guess (in the Merits part I prefer to use dots instead of numbers, just for visual variety).
I haven't been able to find a 2e character template for Wolf-Blooded characters (and I have noticed that 2e templates differ slightly from the previous edition in the order traits are listed because I'm a fucking monster).
How would you list a Wolf-Blooded character if you wrote one in the books?
Also, just as another formatting question, how do you make the spacing between the lines?
I noticed that each trait "section" (for example "Mental Skills") has some space between it and the next and previous traits ("Social Attributes", "Physical Skills") but the line itself can have a couple of paragraphs that don't space in themselves (like, if a character has a bunch of Mental Skills and they go on for a couple of lines, these two lines will be closer together than the gap between them and the next "section").
To explain what I mean, I'm talking about the character templates that you use to lay out characters in the books, like so:
NAME
Auspice:
Tribe:
Mental Attributes: Intelligence, Wits, Resolve
Physical Attributes: Strength (), Dexterity (), Stamina ()
Social Attributes: Presence, Manipulation (), Composure
Mental Skills:
Physical Skills:
Social Skills:
Merits: Language (First Tongue) (●), Totem ●
Primal Urge: 1
Willpower:
Harmony: 7
Essence Max/Per Turn: 10/1
Blood:
Bone:
Health: ()
Initiative:
Defense:
Speed:
Size: 5 (6/7/6/4)
Renown:
Gifts:
Rites:
I don't know what you call them, I just call them "character templates".
I've been using this sort of layout in Word since Vampire: the Masquerade Revised, having copied the way characters are presented in the books.
I just find it much easier to make characters this way when I'm writing them than to edit a character sheet.
Making it as close as possible to the way you write them in the books is sort of a hobby of mine. I try to use the closest fonts to the ones you use and I try to copy your formatting as much as I can. I diverge in small ways, I guess (in the Merits part I prefer to use dots instead of numbers, just for visual variety).
I haven't been able to find a 2e character template for Wolf-Blooded characters (and I have noticed that 2e templates differ slightly from the previous edition in the order traits are listed because I'm a fucking monster).
How would you list a Wolf-Blooded character if you wrote one in the books?
Also, just as another formatting question, how do you make the spacing between the lines?
I noticed that each trait "section" (for example "Mental Skills") has some space between it and the next and previous traits ("Social Attributes", "Physical Skills") but the line itself can have a couple of paragraphs that don't space in themselves (like, if a character has a bunch of Mental Skills and they go on for a couple of lines, these two lines will be closer together than the gap between them and the next "section").
Comment