User Profile

[Stupid Loserman]

Keep it at five. The further away you grow from humanity, the more connections to the living you need to ground yourself.

[Stupid Loserman]

That's the case. I believe you can also still recover Willpower from defending your relationship with a non-attached living touchstone, but I'm not 100% on that.

[Stupid Loserman]

Losing a touchstone and detaching a touchstone are different things. Should the Ventrue fall to Humanity 6 as a result of a breaking point, the touchstone becomes detached, but it is still there as a touchstone. The vampire is simply no longer able to draw upon that connection for bonus dice to resist breaking points, until he should increase his Humanity to 7, reattaching the touchstone. He does not need to replace the touchstone or risk becoming Languid. To entirely lose the touchstone, something would have to happen to shatter his ability to depend on that relationship as a human focus. If...

[Stupid Loserman]

Could be thinking of the Rest Stop Killer from Slasher? Not that one guy constitutes a cult....

[Stupid Loserman]

Discussion of "blue-book" games, as games about mortals using the Chronicles of Darkness Rulebook (or the 1e World of Darkness Rulebook before it) are sometimes called, goes in the Chronicles of Darkness forum to which Vampire is a subforum. And yes, it's a pretty good system for straightforward horror games, especially with the CofD Rulebook's addition of sections on building Horrors and ephemeral entities as antagonists. That addition plugged the one significant hole I saw in the 1e Rulebook, which, outside of ghosts, left that work to the Storyteller without much in the way of gu...

[Stupid Loserman]

It's explaining the mechanics of how Promethean digestion works; it's not talking about a means of recovering points of Pyros. Think of it as trace elements infused into the normal workings of the Promethean's humours. Enough to keep the body moving.

[Stupid Loserman]

This has been on my mind since the backer previews, but I've neglected to bring it up until now, since now is the errata phase during which actual content is revised. At the same time, it's a subjective point and not a clear error, so the errata thread does not seem appropriate for it. I'm posting here with the hope that it might be noticed and considered before the final version of the book. It's also not really something that breaks Changeling 2e, which is overall a quite good game and a fine successor to an excellent forebear. But it still itches at my mind.

I don't understand...

[Stupid Loserman]

Still time to get 'em at the $5 level (or bundled in with any higher level) I believe.