Originally posted by Palp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Paradox Interactive (the Crusader Kings people, not the Conan/Mutant Chronicles ones) buy the White Wolf properties [Merged x10]
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ephsy View PostI understand the need to focus on WoD for a transmediation of the brand, it's far easier with a canon present like the metaplot. If they had picked CofD for it, it would have killed one of the things I loved best about it.Last edited by Palp; 02-28-2016, 10:49 AM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ephsy View PostAnyone else getting the vibe the interviewer was a total fanboy?
Leave a comment:
-
I understand the need to focus on WoD for a transmediation of the brand, it's far easier with a canon present like the metaplot. If they had picked CofD for it, it would have killed one of the things I loved best about it.
Originally posted by haren View PostIt still feels kinda off with what he's saying. Like the version of WoD he's playing isn't the same version we might be familiar with. If that makes sense.
Anyone else getting the vibe the interviewer was a total fanboy?
Leave a comment:
-
It feels like a toned down version of the previous interview. Like, I get thinking WoD is great. It provides a very different sort of game from the CoD. That said... it still feels kinda off with what he's saying. Like the version of WoD he's playing isn't the same version we might be familiar with. If that makes sense.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Asmodai View PostHere's a new interview. The site seems completley new :P
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Asmodai View PostHere's a new interview. The site seems completley new :P
Leave a comment:
-
...and here I thought we were just having a conversation. So be it. You don't want to see it, I'll shut up.
Leave a comment:
-
Stop the pointless arguing back and forth please. You've each made your case, no need to argue in circles for multiple pages.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Drake View Post...so now we've gone from you not viewing this positively to implying strongly that no one in the entire fan base couldn't view it negatively. I think you are proving my point regarding not letting someone potentially reacting illogically sway important business decisions.
No matter what the first deal announced was, someone would react to it the way you are reacting to this one.
According to Martin, yes.
The first products for these new lines from Paradox and partners, according to the question to which Martin responded.
That isn't impossible, but I don't find it likely. Look for hints, Martin said there are already some out there.
There is no separation inherent there, you are making up yourself.
World of Darkness, and other role-playing games, draw fans from every walk of life and with every other sort of interests. For example, my last long-running Vampire chronicle sat a food service professional, a dance instructor, a tech support worker, an HR manager at a construction firm, a grocery store manager, and a medical billing specialist around the table - and we happened to have side conversations about video games, pornography, sports, board games, camping, and politics (though I typically cut those short because they have a more negative impact on the mood in the room than bringing up the sorts of pornography I've never heard anyone admit to enjoying).
I guess that's a cultural difference? In America, I've not seen anyone regarding such companies in such a way that wasn't also regarding basically anyone and everything else as similarly "in need of Jesus."
I think you are using a definition for the word "launch" that I am entirely unfamiliar with. Announcing you bought an IP is not a launch. Make a presentation at a con stating your intention for that IP is not a launch.
A launch - putting a product in the consumer's hands - is a launch.
No, I don't. I also don't think making deals as they come along looks either of those.
There are deals that White Wolf could make that would negatively affect their brand - this just isn't one of them.
It can lead to very bad things even if it is both frequent and truthful communication, which I already said. The fact is that no matter what stance is taken on communication there are pros and cons - thus the choice is not between the "good" option and the "bad" option, but between "bad" option and "bad" option with the deciding factor being which set of bad shit the people in charge are better equipped to deal with.
Since there is already evidence that Martin communicating gets people pissed off even when he didn't mean things in a negative way, I think they are making the smart choice in choosing to deal with the bad shit that happens in an environment of not saying anything at all until it's time to say something decisive.
Nope. The man has better shit to be spending his time doing (like his part of getting the World of Darkness products out here to us consumers) than constantly monitoring who is reacting to his statements how and then working out some impossible perfect adjustment so that everybody is reacting "correctly", then continuing to monitor and adjust because each of his clarifications includes those pesky things called words that people can take "very badly."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Palp View PostThat before this there would be several others that the fan base could view positively.
No matter what the first deal announced was, someone would react to it the way you are reacting to this one.
Originally posted by Palp View PostThere will?
Originally posted by Palp View PostOf what?
Originally posted by Palp View PostThe vampire the masquerade 4th edition core book?
Originally posted by Palp View Post...and mostely the sports crowd, separate form the geek and gamer crowd.
World of Darkness, and other role-playing games, draw fans from every walk of life and with every other sort of interests. For example, my last long-running Vampire chronicle sat a food service professional, a dance instructor, a tech support worker, an HR manager at a construction firm, a grocery store manager, and a medical billing specialist around the table - and we happened to have side conversations about video games, pornography, sports, board games, camping, and politics (though I typically cut those short because they have a more negative impact on the mood in the room than bringing up the sorts of pornography I've never heard anyone admit to enjoying).
Originally posted by Palp View PostThese companies are also often seen as quite despicable, preying on the weak.
Originally posted by Palp View PostThey where in a launch the moment they announced the buying of the IP, and specially after they gave a con presentation. That is when people started taking notice and examining them.
A launch - putting a product in the consumer's hands - is a launch.
Originally posted by Palp View PostSo? Do you think Paradox should look poor and desperate?
Originally posted by Palp View PostTaking any offer that comes along to scratch out a quick buck and not minding the consequences and how it makes them and their brand look?
Originally posted by Palp View PostI think communication should be both frequent and truthful. If it is not both of these things it can lead to very bad things
Since there is already evidence that Martin communicating gets people pissed off even when he didn't mean things in a negative way, I think they are making the smart choice in choosing to deal with the bad shit that happens in an environment of not saying anything at all until it's time to say something decisive.
Originally posted by Palp View PostYes, and the answer to that form his side should be to see how people are reacting to what he says, then communicate more to clarify if the reactions are incorrect.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: