Originally posted by Drake
View Post
Yes, I mistyped. It's been such a long time that the only thing I have followed "Vampire: the" with is "Requiem" that my hands often go on auto-pilot and type that instead of "Masquerade" and my eyes don't notice it.
If a book comes out titled Vampire: the Masquerade 4th edition, that is not at all inaccurate as it will be the 4th edition of such a book because, and this is important, whoever picks the title for a book is accurate, even if some fan wants to count differently.
That's how we are looking at a potential 4th edition coming from White Wolf, and how the latest version of D&D is 5th edition rather than 15th edition.
That's how we are looking at a potential 4th edition coming from White Wolf, and how the latest version of D&D is 5th edition rather than 15th edition.
There will be a release in 2016, that's a general release time.
I'm confused as to how you are able to reconcile the statements that you don't find slot machines a suitably dignified use of license and that the things being given the license are "big here in Sweden."
The equivalent would be like me saying that if White Wolf opened a night club with a vampire-chic theme here in America where plenty of folks love the club scene that it would be somehow anything but a potential way to generate interest in the world of darkness among people that don't have it yet, and for people already enjoying the world of darkness to expand their enjoyment to new medium should they desire.
The equivalent would be like me saying that if White Wolf opened a night club with a vampire-chic theme here in America where plenty of folks love the club scene that it would be somehow anything but a potential way to generate interest in the world of darkness among people that don't have it yet, and for people already enjoying the world of darkness to expand their enjoyment to new medium should they desire.
...and when we get to the launch, you can judge whether or not they are "on the ball" or not. Your perception that we are in any stages of a launch right now is in error.
Which is exactly why I don't believe your opinions on these topics hold much weight - turning down an offer when it comes along usually means turning down that offer forever because whatever party you turn down doesn't just sit and wait for you to change your mind, they go a different direction and either succeed (so they don't feel a need to come back to you) or they fail (so they don't have the means to make an appealing deal with you anymore).
That's fine, and it shouldn't. It should fill you with confidence that the lack of communication is intentional, rather than accidental, and maybe even suggest some confidence that once information is given that said information will be accurate.
I know it is a matter of taste, but I greatly prefer only being told accurate information at such a time as it is genuinely relevant to being able to see information in a constant stream that continues to evolve as time goes on and plans change to match practicality - and I prefer the condition of the fanbase under such conditions as well, because speculation and theorizing in the silence is a less caustic environment than declarations of "they lied to us!" and "that's stupid! let's petition for them to change it to match what we want, nevermind how much data they might have which says we're the obvious minority opinion here!" in an ever flowing stream of information changing by necessity.
I know it is a matter of taste, but I greatly prefer only being told accurate information at such a time as it is genuinely relevant to being able to see information in a constant stream that continues to evolve as time goes on and plans change to match practicality - and I prefer the condition of the fanbase under such conditions as well, because speculation and theorizing in the silence is a less caustic environment than declarations of "they lied to us!" and "that's stupid! let's petition for them to change it to match what we want, nevermind how much data they might have which says we're the obvious minority opinion here!" in an ever flowing stream of information changing by necessity.
There is not a word that can be said, especially when strung together with others in order to communicate a thought, which cannot be taken "very badly."
And the real counterpoint: he says a number of things in that interview which can be taken very well - and they are the very same things which you say can be taken very badly
And the real counterpoint: he says a number of things in that interview which can be taken very well - and they are the very same things which you say can be taken very badly
Leave a comment: