In M20, we are given three optional Sphere variants to be used by individual Conventions in the Technocracy that are tailored to better represent the typical Focus of that Convention: Data (an NWO-biased variant of Correspondence), Dimensional Science (a VE-biased variant of Spirit), and Primal Utility (a Syndicate-biased variant of Prime). Elsewhere, I've explored the possibility of expanding on the notion of variant Spheres, or of restructuring the Union's understanding of the Spheres so that the variants stand on their own. Here, I'd like to go the other way and explore the possibility of doing away with the variants altogether, approaching the distinctions entirely in terms of differences in Focus. What gets lost in doing so, and how might it be recovered?
Prime and Primal Utility
Primal Utility does two things better than Prime: making Wonders (Primal Utility can create permanent Wonders at three dots instead of four), and accessing Primal Ventures (Prime can't access Primal Ventures at all). Conversely, Primal Utility has more difficulty dealing with Nodes and Tass. When folding Primal Utility into Prime, the limitations can be kept through the simple expedient of saying that, for example, charging up a Credit Card via a Node is inconsistent with a hypereconomic Practice, as opposed to loading it up by means of a Primal Venture. Similarly, I'm OK with Primal Utility's greater facility in Wonder-making being lost, as the facility is still there; it's just at four dots instead of three.
More generally, what Primal resources the mage can tap into is highly dependent on the mage's Focus: the resources that a Syndic can access will differ from those that a Void Engineer can access, which in turn will differ from what a Chorister can access or what a Hermetic can access. It would all be covered by the same Prime Sphere, though. In order to do this, the notion of the Primal Venture needs to be added to Prime.
Or rather, a generalization of the notion of the Primal Venture needs to be added to Prime. Choristers ought to be able to tap into religious activities conducted by faithful Sleepers in a manner similar to how Syndics can tap into economic activities conducted by business-oriented Sleepers. They're the same sort of thing in general (organized human activity as a Primal resource); and the differences between them are reflected in the Focus of the mage trying to access them.
Spirit and Dimensional Science
In a similar way, many (most? all?) differences between Spirit and Dimensional Science can be addressed in terms of the mage's Focus — if you're willing to take a more flexible view on things like Gauntlet strength. The simplest approach here would be to say that Gauntlet strength manifests one way for mystics and another way for technomancers: the same Sphere gets used by Void Engineers, Etherites, Dreamspeakers, and Hermetics; but the former two will tend to find the Gauntlet in tech-friendly Reality Zones to be more pliable, while the latter two will tend to find the Gauntlet in mystic-friendly Zones more pliable.
Correspondence and Data
And riffing off of the notion presented above, Focus-specific “Correspondence Range” charts potentially let us unify the different versions of Correspondence into a single Sphere.
More thoughts later, when I have more time. In the meantime, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Addendum: I should probably clarify. In folding everything back into the original nine Spheres, the idea is that the hierarchy of effects (e.g., which Effects require one dot of a given Sphere, which ones require two dots, and so on) is the same no matter what; however, these Sphere ranks are necessary conditions but not sufficient conditions: in addition to having the necessary Spheres, you need an appropriate Focus (in the M20 sense of the term). And the differences between the Spheres and their technocratic variants can be approximated by what is or isn't appropriate for a given Focus.
That, and some of the tables used in working an Effect have built-in assumptions about the magick being cast. When that happens, variants of those tables should be provided for mages whose Focus doesn't conform to those assumptions. That's the whole reason the Dimensional Science and Data variants were originally conceived: the Void Engineer Focus didn't mesh with the assumptions built into the Gauntlet Strength chart, and the NWO Focus doesn't mesh with the assumptions built into the Correspondence Range table. By divorcing the tables from the Spheres and making them a matter of Focus, you can remove the need for Dimensional Science and Data as variant Spheres.
Prime and Primal Utility
Primal Utility does two things better than Prime: making Wonders (Primal Utility can create permanent Wonders at three dots instead of four), and accessing Primal Ventures (Prime can't access Primal Ventures at all). Conversely, Primal Utility has more difficulty dealing with Nodes and Tass. When folding Primal Utility into Prime, the limitations can be kept through the simple expedient of saying that, for example, charging up a Credit Card via a Node is inconsistent with a hypereconomic Practice, as opposed to loading it up by means of a Primal Venture. Similarly, I'm OK with Primal Utility's greater facility in Wonder-making being lost, as the facility is still there; it's just at four dots instead of three.
More generally, what Primal resources the mage can tap into is highly dependent on the mage's Focus: the resources that a Syndic can access will differ from those that a Void Engineer can access, which in turn will differ from what a Chorister can access or what a Hermetic can access. It would all be covered by the same Prime Sphere, though. In order to do this, the notion of the Primal Venture needs to be added to Prime.
Or rather, a generalization of the notion of the Primal Venture needs to be added to Prime. Choristers ought to be able to tap into religious activities conducted by faithful Sleepers in a manner similar to how Syndics can tap into economic activities conducted by business-oriented Sleepers. They're the same sort of thing in general (organized human activity as a Primal resource); and the differences between them are reflected in the Focus of the mage trying to access them.
Spirit and Dimensional Science
In a similar way, many (most? all?) differences between Spirit and Dimensional Science can be addressed in terms of the mage's Focus — if you're willing to take a more flexible view on things like Gauntlet strength. The simplest approach here would be to say that Gauntlet strength manifests one way for mystics and another way for technomancers: the same Sphere gets used by Void Engineers, Etherites, Dreamspeakers, and Hermetics; but the former two will tend to find the Gauntlet in tech-friendly Reality Zones to be more pliable, while the latter two will tend to find the Gauntlet in mystic-friendly Zones more pliable.
Correspondence and Data
And riffing off of the notion presented above, Focus-specific “Correspondence Range” charts potentially let us unify the different versions of Correspondence into a single Sphere.
More thoughts later, when I have more time. In the meantime, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Addendum: I should probably clarify. In folding everything back into the original nine Spheres, the idea is that the hierarchy of effects (e.g., which Effects require one dot of a given Sphere, which ones require two dots, and so on) is the same no matter what; however, these Sphere ranks are necessary conditions but not sufficient conditions: in addition to having the necessary Spheres, you need an appropriate Focus (in the M20 sense of the term). And the differences between the Spheres and their technocratic variants can be approximated by what is or isn't appropriate for a given Focus.
That, and some of the tables used in working an Effect have built-in assumptions about the magick being cast. When that happens, variants of those tables should be provided for mages whose Focus doesn't conform to those assumptions. That's the whole reason the Dimensional Science and Data variants were originally conceived: the Void Engineer Focus didn't mesh with the assumptions built into the Gauntlet Strength chart, and the NWO Focus doesn't mesh with the assumptions built into the Correspondence Range table. By divorcing the tables from the Spheres and making them a matter of Focus, you can remove the need for Dimensional Science and Data as variant Spheres.
Comment