Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[Warning - Trigger Topics] Chris Avellone wins libel suit against accusers

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [Warning - Trigger Topics] Chris Avellone wins libel suit against accusers

    Due to the sensitivity of the topic, this is something that I ask everyone to be on their best behavior with for discussing. However, it is relevant due to Avellone's role in game development and the industry as a whole as well as Bloodlines 2.

    Video game writer Chris Avellone has reached a confidential settlement with two women who accused him of sexual assault. The accusers have issued a public statement retracting all claims of sexual assault.


    Back in June of 2021 I reported on video game writer Chris Avellone’s libel lawsuit against two women who had accused Avellone of sexual assault on Twitter. Avellone publicly denied the accusations and announced he was taking both women to court over their statements.

    When the initial case was dismissed by a California court on jurisdictional grounds, Avellone filed the lawsuit in Illinois (September, 2022).

    Now, nearly two years later, the case has been settled. Avellone’s accusers, Karissa Barrows and Kelly Bristol, have signed a joint statement retracting their previous claims and clearing Avellone of wrongdoing, stating that their original claims were misinterpreted. “The settlement agreement provides for a seven-figure payment to Mr. Avellone,” Avellone’s attorney confirmed to me via email. The settlement is confidential and further details were not provided.

    In a blog post titled “Joint Statement From Karissa Barrows, Kelly Bristol,and Chris Avellone” Avellone writes:

    “The parties resolved the matter and claims were dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a confidential settlement that provides for a seven-figure payment that includes the return of the attorney fee award entered against Mr. Avellone in California.

    “I understand that Ms. Barrows has requested to retract her comments to the media about me.”

    I have received a copy of the below statement from Mr. Avellone’s lawyers.

    The statement from Barrows and Bristol reads:

    “After engaging with Mr. Avellone, we have prepared the following statement:

    “Mr. Avellone never sexually abused either of us. We have no knowledge that he has ever sexually abused any women. We have no knowledge that Mr. Avellone has ever misused corporate funds. Anything we have previously said or written about Mr. Avellone to the contrary was not our intent. We wanted to support women in the industry. In so doing, our words have been misinterpreted to suggest specific allegations of misconduct that were neither expressed nor intended. We are passionate about the safety, security and agency of women, minorities, LGBTQIA+ persons, and every other community that has seen persecution in the video game industry. We believe Mr. Avellone shares a desire to protect and uplift those communities. We believe that he deserves a full return to the industry and support him in those endeavors.”

    - Karissa Barrows, Kelly Rae Bristol


    Avellone’s statement on the matter reads:

    “I appreciate the willingness of Ms. Barrows and Ms. Bristol to work with us in addressing issues within the game community, and their advocacy is to be commended and supported.

    There are still many very real challenges that we face but am confident we can face them together.

    In the spirit of these goals, I would ask everyone to respect the privacy of Ms. Barrows and Ms. Bristol and use this opportunity as a means to listen to all voices in improving our culture and our communities.”

    - Chris Avellone

    Barrows had previously claimed on Twitter that Avellone was “an abusive, abrasive, conniving sexual predator” who had attempted to sexually assault her after getting her “black out drunk.” Barrows told Kotaku in 2020, “He’s f****** disgusting, but he did not rape me. He assaulted me, 100 percent, but I stopped him.”

    Avellone was fired from his job working on Dying Light 2 when the accusations came to light and has been widely blacklisted from the industry after a decades-long career working on dozens of popular video games including numerous RPGs like Pillars of Eternity, Icewind Dale and Fallout 2.

    This is a breaking story. Stay tuned.

    This post was updated with the exact statement from Avellone’s lawyers in order to provide more detail on the payout. Further details from the confidential settlement agreement remain confidential.


    Author of Cthulhu Armageddon, I was a Teenage Weredeer, Straight Outta Fangton, Lucifer's Star, and the Supervillainy Saga.

    Forum Terms of Use
    the Contact Us link.

  • #2
    Interesting, sexual abuse accusations are notoriously hard to convinct but innocent until proven guilty is a thing. Without personal knowledge of him or his accusers I reluctantly have to presume chris' innocence.
    Last edited by Ragged Robin; 03-26-2023, 10:39 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with Ragged Robin. I also wonder where the accusers got the money to pay Chris Avellone a seven-figure settlement.


      Amethyst is my birthstone. She/they.

      Comment


      • #4
        what a terribe thing they did to him
        Last edited by Nicolas Milioni; 03-26-2023, 11:14 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          After what happened to Johnny Depp and his baseless accusations and the co creator of Rick and Morty. People are being more concerned about such charges and how the accusers seem to get off Scott free when they get caught in a lie.


          What in the name of Set is going on here?

          Comment


          • #6
            Given the fact that the amount of collateral damage from unfounded accusations has been growing since the #MeToo thing got rolling is on par with the french revolution, why are people not insisting on wrongful termination clauses in their contracts specifically to prevent dismissal until after a court verdict has been reached. I mean this has been going on long enough for the contract lawyers to get wise to this situation.

            Comment


            • #7
              Rephrasing "got his opponents to settle" isn't the same as "winning." It's just forcing them not to talk about it any more.

              Originally posted by Ragged Robin View Post
              Interesting, sexual abuse accusations are notoriously hard to convinct but innocent until proven guilty is a thing. Without personal knowledge of him or his accusers I reluctantly have to presume chris' innocence.
              This is a defamation case, not a criminal case. The standards of evidence and what juries are allowed to draw inferences from are different.

              He also sued them. He accused them of lying, and rather than going to court to prove that they lied, he settled so the truth will never actually be found out by the public. We're allowed to infer whatever we want from that.

              Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
              I also wonder where the accusers got the money to pay Chris Avellone a seven-figure settlement.
              As noted in the article, that figure includes the money awarded to them as part of a finding in their favor in California. "Seven-figures" sounds like a lot, but for two individuals getting private presentation in California (which Avellone was forced to pay for after the finding against him)? I'd wager that's pretty much where the majority of the money is headed. Lawyers are, definitely getting most of the money anyway.

              Originally posted by Nicolas Milioni View Post
              what a terribe thing they did to him
              This sort of cut & dry interpretation of a defamation settlement only makes things worse, for example:

              Originally posted by Lysander View Post
              After what happened to Johnny Depp...
              As a reminder, Depp and Heard were both found to have defamed and abused each other. Who got more money out of it is largely based on who has more money, not who is more or less morally culpable.

              But because the public doesn't like court cases to end with messy convoluted resolutions (which happens far more often than not), someone was declared the winner, and that was Depp, despite all of the horrible shit he admitted to doing on the stand.

              Justin Roiland? His case wasn't dropped because there was nothing there, just not enough there to convict them. But the media doesn't like leaving things without an "ending.' so there needs to be a narrative of "vindication" for him even though he wasn't vindicated.

              Comment


              • #8
                sorry if i jumped the gun,but didnt't the accusers downright stated they lied?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Nicolas Milioni View Post
                  sorry if i jumped the gun,but didnt't the accusers downright stated they lied?
                  It was settled out of court, ie both parties (while being advised by their lawyers) came to an agreement to end the matter without going through a whole trial. Considering how it ended (with the statement and seven-figure-payment to Chris Avellone), it's clear who had the stronger hand in those negotiations. But there's a lot that goes into considerations like this: money, time, the invasion of privacy etc. There are lots of reasons to settle out of court before getting bogged down in a trial. But at the end of the day, it's just two parties who came to an agreement. We don't have all the facts and we don't know what these negotiations were like. So, really knowing who's right or wrong in a situation like this can only be speculative.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    oh ok,i have no knowledge of american law so i am not able to give an informed opinion

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Heavy Arms View Post
                      Rephrasing "got his opponents to settle" isn't the same as "winning." It's just forcing them not to talk about it any more.



                      This is a defamation case, not a criminal case. The standards of evidence and what juries are allowed to draw inferences from are different.

                      He also sued them. He accused them of lying, and rather than going to court to prove that they lied, he settled so the truth will never actually be found out by the public. We're allowed to infer whatever we want from that.


                      True, have any actual changes been put against him with that in mind?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not to my knowledge, and at this point it would be past the statue of limitations for the accusations made anyway.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Heavy Arms View Post
                          Not to my knowledge, and at this point it would be past the statue of limitations for the accusations made anyway.
                          Then my initial statement stands and I have to presume chris' innocence. Since what anyone has on him is bugger all even if it does leave a slightly bad taste in the mouth.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Not to mention that we should wait for all the story to be told before jumping the gun. Recent events have proven and even old cases like The JonBenet Ramsey case have borne out.


                            What in the name of Set is going on here?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              We don't HAVE to presume anything about the man. No criminal charges were brought, and the defamation suit ended in out-of-court settlement. Legally, nothing has been established either way.

                              The COURTS must presume him innocent. WE don't need to. WE can make whatever judgements we like.


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X